" 450 U.S., at 272, n.18. When conflict stems from honest and open listening, disagreement can be a good thing, say Francesca Gino and Julia Minson. Id., at 489-491. At petitioner's request, the District Court conducted an evidentiary hearing on the conflict claim and issued a thorough opinion, which found that counsel's brief representation of the victim had no effect whatsoever on the course of petitioner's trial. Lodging to App. Without inquiry, the trial court had denied counsel's motions for the appointment of separate counsel and had refused to allow counsel to cross-examine any of the defendants on behalf of the other two. For the reasons stated, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is. Ante, at 10. The Court noted that counsel stated he had sent a letter to the trial court after sentencing, saying the fines were more than the defendants could afford, id., at 268, n.13, a move obviously in the defendants' interest. 1979, No. Id., at 338. Saunders could not have failed to see that the mother's statement should be rebutted, and there is no apparent explanation for his failure to offer the rebuttal he knew, except that he had obtained the information as the victim's counsel and subject to an obligation of confidentiality. Justice Kennedy, with whom Justice O'Connor joins, concurring. Learn more about FindLaws newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy. This assumption has not been challenged. See Wood, supra, at 272 ("at the revocation hearing, or at earlier stages of the proceedings below"). Beth A. Rosenson, University of Florida. Unless the accused has acquiesced in such representation, the defense presented is not the defense guaranteed him by the Constitution, for, in a very real sense, it is not his defense." At that point in the proceeding, by definition, the defendant has no lawyer to protect his interests and must rely entirely on the judge. App. This record suggested that the employer's interest in establishing a favorable equal-protection precedent (reducing the fines he would have to pay for his indigent employees in the future) diverged from the defendants' interest in obtaining leniency or paying lesser fines to avoid imprisonment. See ante, at 5. Setting aside Mickens' conviction is the only remedy that can maintain public confidence in the fairness of the procedures employed in capital cases. Since the Wood judge's duty was unlike the Holloway judge's obligation to take care for the future, it would have made no sense for the Wood Court to impose a Holloway remedy. has a right to know if the researcher might be biased, and that measures have been taken to minimize the possibility of bias. 3-14. Kadyrov's Chechnya: bikers, boxers, bribes 5. Change the plan you will roll onto at any time during your trial by visiting the Settings & Account section. Held:In order to demonstrate a Sixth Amendment violation where the trial court fails to inquire into a potential conflict of interest about which it knew or reasonably should have known, a defendant must establish that a conflict of interest adversely affected his counsel's performance. Wood v. Georgia, 450 U.S. 261, 267, 272 (1981). " 450 U.S., at 273, nor does it reference Sullivan in "shorthand," ante, at 8. However, "a reviewing court cannot presume that the possibility for conflict has resulted in ineffective assistance of . Souter, J., filed a dissenting opinion. The state judge, however, did nothing to discharge her constitutional duty of care. 79-6027, at72 (transcript of Jan. 26, 1979, probation revocation hearing).6 The Wood Court also knew that a motion stressing equal protection was not filed by defense counsel until two weeks after the revocation hearing, on the day before probation was to be revoked and the defendants locked up, App. ; nor did the convicted defendant argue that the trial judge otherwise knew or should have known of the risk described in Holloway, that counsel's representation might be impaired by conflicting obligations to the defendants to be tried later, id., at 343. You can still enjoy your subscription until the end of your current billing period. In 1920, psychologist John Watson and his future wife, Rosalind Rayner, experimented on an infant to prove the theory of classical conditioning. State's counsel suggested that in arguing for forgiveness of fines owing to inability to pay, defense counsel was merely trying to protect the employer from an obligation to the defendants to pay the fines. FindLaw.com Free, trusted legal information for consumers and legal professionals, SuperLawyers.com Directory of U.S. attorneys with the exclusive Super Lawyers rating, Abogado.com The #1 Spanish-language legal website for consumers, LawInfo.com Nationwide attorney directory and legal consumer resources. Cf. What is significant is that, as this Court thus described the circumstances putting the judge on notice, they were not complete until the revocation hearing was finished (nearly two years after sentencing) and the judge knew that the lawyer was relying heavily on equal protection instead of arguments for leniency to help the defendants. See, e.g., Campbell v. Rice, 265 F.3d 878, 887-888 (CA9 2001) (reversing conviction under Holloway when trial judge failed to enquire after the prosecutor indicated defense counsel had just been arraigned by the prosecutor's office on felony drug charges); United States v. Rogers, 209 F.3d 139, 145-146 (CA2 2000) (reversing conviction when District Court failed to enquire on notice that counsel for defendant alleging police misconduct was a police commissioner); United States v. Allen, 831 F.2d 1487, 1495-1496 (CA9 1987) (finding Magistrate Judge had reasonably enquired into joint representation of 17 codefendants who entered a group guilty plea, but reversing because the District Court failed to enquire when defense counsel later gave the court a list "rank[ing] the defendants by their relative culpability"). His lab conducts basic and applied sciences and attracts a steady stream of extramural funds. In checking for potential conflicts of interest (COI), the SRO cast a wider net and found something troubling. Examples include the following cases: BlueCrest Capital Management. His strongest selling points were his vast experience, and willingness to provide the service for a percentage of the total construction cost. While the perceptive and conscientious lawyer (as in Holloway) needs nothing more than ethical duty to induce an objection, the venal lawyer is not apt to be reformed by a general rule that says his client will have an easier time reversing a conviction down the road if the lawyer calls attention to his own venality.10. Premium Digital includes access to our premier business column, Lex, as well as 15 curated newsletters covering key business themes with original, in-depth reporting. Williams v. Reed, 29 F.Cas. Treating the case as more like Cuyler and remanding was obviously the correct choice. We granted certiorari to consider whether this violated the Equal Protection Clause, but during the course of our consideration certain disturbing circumstances came to our attention: At the probation-revocation hearing (as at all times since their arrest) the defendants had been represented by the lawyer for their employer (the owner of the business that purveyed the obscenity), and their employer paid the attorney's fees. This right has been accorded, we have said, "not for its own sake, but because of the effect it has on the ability of the accused to receive a fair trial." A to Brief in Opposition in Wood v. Georgia, O.T. as in the case of Apple. Under the Court's analysis, if defense counsel objects to the appointment, reversal without inquiry into adverse effect is required. On these facts, we conclude that the Sixth Amendment imposed upon the trial court no affirmative duty to inquire into the propriety of multiple representation." This appearance, together with the likelihood of prejudice in the typical case, are serious enough to warrant a categorical rule--a rule that does not require proof of prejudice in the individual case. As discussed, the rule applied when the trial judge is not aware of the conflict (and thus not obligated to inquire) is that prejudice will be presumed only if the conflict has significantly affected counsel's performance--thereby rendering the verdict unreliable, even though Strickland prejudice cannot be shown. It is also the means of establishing a controversy." Because "[o]n the record before us, we [could not] be sure whether counsel was influenced in his basic strategic decisions by the interests of the employer who hired him," ibid., we remanded for the trial court "to determine whether the conflict of interest that this record strongly suggests actually existed," id., at 273. 1999). Moreover, petitioner's proposed rule of automatic reversal makes little policy sense. A tiny pilot study found that so-called chameleon vines mimicked plastic leaves, but experts say poor study design and conflicts of interest undermine the report. The duty of the Wood judge could only have been to enquire into the past (what had happened two years earlier at sentencing, the setting of probation 19 months later, the ensuing failures to pay, and the testimony that had already been given at the revocation hearing), just like the responsibility of the state and federal habeas courts reviewing the record in Cuyler in postconviction proceedings, see id., at 338-339. For You For Only $13.90/page! The trial court's awareness of a potential conflict neither renders it more likely that counsel's performance was significantly affected nor in any other way renders the verdict unreliable. If you do nothing, you will be auto-enrolled in our premium digital monthly subscription plan and retain complete access for $69 per month. Although I express no view at this time about how our precedents should treat most ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims involving an alleged conflict of interest (or, for that matter, whether Holloway, Sullivan, and Wood provide a sensible or coherent framework for dealing with those cases at all), I am convinced that this case is not governed by those precedents, for the following reasons. Nor is that irrationality mitigated by the Government's effort to analogize the majority's objection requirement to the general rule that in the absence of plain error litigants get no relief from error without objection. It is the Court's rule that leads to an anomalous result. See also, ABA Ann. Some types of conflicts of interest include: Nepotism Nepotism is when someone hires, promotes or otherwise provides special treatment in the workplace to a family member or close friend. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694. 2d, at 613-615. The District Judge reviewing the federal habeas petition in this case found that the state judge who appointed Bryan Saunders to represent petitioner Mickens on a capital murder charge knew or should have known that obligations stemming from Saunders's prior representation of the victim, Timothy Hall, potentially conflicted. If it were otherwise, the judge's duty would not be limited to cases where the attorney is suspected of harboring a conflict of interest. Real-life conflict scenarios can keep groups from being effective. Id., at 390. The District Court denied habeas relief, and an en banc majority of the Fourth Circuit affirmed. Reputational damage can occur when an actor such as a whistleblower, journalist or other interested third party makes public comments on a conflict of interest. " Fulminante, supra, at 310. Defense counsel also cited two equal protection decisions of this Court, Tate v. Short, 401 U.S. 395 (1971), and Williams v. Illinois, 399 U.S. 235 (1970); it may very well be that he meant to say "equal protection" rather than "legal protection" or the latter was in fact a garbled transcription, but it seems unlikely that the Wood Court was referring to this statement when it said counsel "was pressing a constitutional attack rather than making the arguments for leniency," 450 U.S., at 272, because it was made to supplement, not replace, appeals to leniency based on the specific financial situations of the individual defendants. 435 U.S., at 490-492. The name "BRYAN SAUNDERS," in large, handwritten letters, was prominently visible as the appointed lawyer on a one-page docket sheet four inches above where the judge signed her name and wrote: "Remove from docket. personalising content and ads, providing social media features and to The. But when, as in Sullivan, the judge lacked this knowledge, such a showing is required. Id., at 356-357. 10 The Battle Of Bloody Bayc.1480. The judge's duty applies only when a Holloway objection fails to induce a resolutely obdurate judge to take action upon the explicit complaint of a lawyer facing impossible demands. University Publications of America, National Reporter on Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility, Vols. After the prosecution rested, counsel objected to the joint representation a third time, advising the court that all three defendants had decided to testify; again the court refused to appoint separate lawyers. The relevance of Saunders' prior representation of Hall to the new appointment was far too important to be concealed. . App. With these observations, I join the opinion of the Court. In this line of precedent, our focus was properly upon the duty of the trial court judge to inquire into a potential conflict. There was certainly cause for reasonable disagreement on the issue. V), in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, alleging, inter alia, that he was denied effective assistance of counsel because one of his court-appointed attorneys had a conflict of interest at trial. The judge's duty independent of objection, as described in Cuyler and Wood, is made concrete by reversal for failure to honor it. I disagree with the Court's assertion that the inquiry mandated by Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335 (1980), will not aid in the determination of conflict and effect. In a capital case, the evidence submitted by both sides regarding the victim's character may easily tip the scale of the jury's choice between life or death. The juvenile-court judge, whom circumstances had thrust into the unusual position of having to appoint counsel in a notorious capital case, certainly knew or had reason to know of the possibility that Saunders's 14-day representation of the murder victim, up to the start of the previous business day, may have created a risk of impairing his representation of Mickens in his upcoming murder trial. The remedy for the judge's dereliction of duty should be an order vacating the conviction and affording a new trial. Of course, a judge who gets wind of conflict during trial may have to enquire in both directions: prospectively to assess the risk of conflict if the lawyer remains in place; if there is no such risk requiring removal and mistrial, conversely, the judge may have to enquire retrospectively to see whether a conflict has actually affected the defendant adversely, see infra, at 13-14. The fallacy of the Government's argument, however, has been on the books since Wood was decided. The District Court's findings depend upon credibility judgments made after hearing the testimony of petitioner's counsel, Bryan Saunders, and other witnesses. It would be a major departure to say that the trial judge must step in every time defense counsel appears to be providing ineffective assistance, and indeed, there is no precedent to support this proposition. See cases cited ante, at 10-11. Justice Stevens asserts that this reading (and presumably Justice Souter's reading as well, post, at 13), is wrong, post, at 9; that Wood only requires petitioner to show that a real conflict existed, not that it affected counsel's performance, post, at 9-10. 2017-04-02T05:15:00Z. Indeed, because multiple representation was not suspect per se, and because counsel was in the best position to anticipate a risk of conflict, the Court spoke at one point as though nothing but an objection would place a court on notice of a prospective conflict. Please try again. Petitioner's description of roads not taken would entail two degrees of speculation. Id., at 272. Only one of the council members, Matt Grocott voted no, citing what he saw as a significant conflict of interest. This Court held that the motions apprised the trial judge of a "risk" that continuing the joint representation would subject defense counsel in the pending trial to the impossible obligations of simultaneously furthering the conflicting interests of the several defendants, id., at 484, and we reversed the convictions on the basis of the judge's failure to respond to the prospective conflict, without any further showing of harm, id., at 491. When the problem comes to the trial court's attention before any potential conflict has become actual, the court has a duty to act prospectively to assess the risk and, if the risk is not too remote, to eliminate it or to render it acceptable through a defendant's knowing and intelligent waiver. even if no particular prejudice is shown and even if the defendant was clearly guilty." At FindLaw.com, we pride ourselves on being the number one source of free legal information and resources on the web. Three weeks before trial, counsel moved for separate representation; the court held a hearing and denied the motion. 33,34 Second, social science and behavior economic research on pharmaceutical industry practices have indicated that gifts of any size create feelings of obligation to reciprocate and that judgments are 450 U.S., at 268. Indeed, even if Saunders had learned relevant information, the District Court found that he labored under the impression he had no continuing duty at all to his deceased client. They have invoked the Sullivan standard not only when (as here) there is a conflict rooted in counsel's obligations to former clients, see, e.g., Perillo v. Johnson, 205 F.3d 775, 797-799 (CA5 2001); Freund v. Butterworth, 165 F.3d 839, 858-860 (CA11 1999); Mannhalt v. Reed, 847 F.2d 576, 580 (CA9 1988); United States v. Young, 644 F.2d 1008, 1013 (CA4 1981), but even when representation of the defendant somehow implicates counsel's personal or financial interests, including a book deal, United States v. Hearst, 638 F.2d 1190, 1193 (CA9 1980), a job with the prosecutor's office, Garcia v. Bunnell, 33 F.3d 1193, 1194-1195, 1198, n.4 (CA9 1994), the teaching of classes to Internal Revenue Service agents, United States v. Michaud, 925 F.2d 37, 40-42 (CA1 1991), a romantic "entanglement" with the prosecutor, Summerlin v. Stewart, 267 F.3d 926, 935-941 (CA9 2001), or fear of antagonizing the trial judge, United States v. Sayan, 968 F. 2d 55, 64-65 (CADC 1992). It's an issue that boards have had to consider, and CEOs have had to consider, for a long time.". Under Virginia law, juvenile case files are confidential and may not generally be disclosed without a court order, see Va. Code Ann. Id., at 489-490. According to data we analyzed, a nearly . This seems to us less a categorical rule of decision than a restatement of the issue to be decided. That duty was violated. Saunders did not disclose to the court, his co-counsel, or petitioner that he had previously represented Hall. It arises from the fact that the Commonwealth seeks to execute a defendant, having provided that defendant with a lawyer who, only yesterday, represented the victim. Rule Crim. We pointed out that conflicts created by multiple representation characteristically deterred a lawyer from taking some step that he would have taken if unconflicted, and we explained that the consequent absence of footprints would often render proof of prejudice virtually impossible. Wood did not hold that in the absence of objection, the Cuyler rule governs even when a judge is prospectively on notice of a risk of conflicted counsel. 211-213; see also id., at 219. The notion that Wood created a new rule sub silentio--and in a case where certiorari had been granted on an entirely different question, and the parties had neither briefed nor argued the conflict-of-interest issue--is implausible.5. Cronic, 466 U.S., at 661, and n. 28. 156-157, 218 (Jan. 13, 1999)). Most Courts of Appeals, however, have applied Sullivan to claims of successive representation as well as to some insidious conflicts arising from a lawyer's self-interest. We support credit card, debit card and PayPal payments. Id., at 488 ("[W]henever a trial court improperly requires joint representation over timely objection reversal is automatic"). We use In Sullivan, no "special circumstances" triggered the trial court's duty to inquire. As an initial matter, the 7-to-3 en banc majority determined that petitioner's failure to raise his conflict-of-interest claim in state court did not preclude review, concluding that petitioner had established cause and that the "inquiry as to prejudice for purposes of excusing [petitioner's] default incorporates the test for evaluating his underlying conflict of interest claim." Here are some of the most newsworthy business and commercial disputes of 2013 - This was a year that saw many hardball tactics backfire, costly legal battles were waged, and many negotiated agreements were ripped to shreds. The Court had just cited and quoted Holloway v. Arkansas, 435 U.S. 475 (1978), which held that the judge was obligated to enquire into the risk of a prospective conflict, id., at 484. The law on conflicted counsel has to face the fact that one of our leading cases arose after a trial in which counsel may well have kept silent about conflicts not out of obtuseness or inattention, but for the sake of deliberately favoring a third party's interest over the clients, and this very case comes to us with reason to suspect that Saunders suppressed his conflicts for the sake of a second fee in a case getting public attention. According to the Washington Post, the House Committee on Education and Labor has sought records concerning potential conflicts of interest for more than a year. In my view, to carry out a death sentence so obtained would invariably "diminis[h] faith" in the fairness and integrity of our criminal justice system. See also Geer, Representation of Multiple Criminal Defendants: Conflicts of Interest and the Professional Responsibilities of the Defense Attorney, 62 Minn. L.Rev. 422 U.S., at 820-821. Id., at 478. On the other hand, a reference to "equal protection," which the Court could have taken as a reflection of the employer's interest, did not occur until the very end of the revocation hearing. Thus, the Sullivan standard is not properly read as requiring inquiry into actual conflict as something separate and apart from adverse effect. 2d 586 (ED Va. 1999). Despite knowledge of the lawyer's prior representation, she violated that duty. Justice Souter's statement that "the signs that a conflict may have occurred were clear to the judge at the close of the probation revocation proceeding," post, at 13--when it became apparent that counsel had neglected the "strategy more obviously in the defendants' interest, of requesting the court to reduce the fines or defer their collection," post, at 10--would more accurately be phrased "the effect of the conflict upon counsel's performance was clear to the judge at the close of the probation revocation proceeding.". 446 U.S., at 350 (emphasis added). See App. Discussing the necessity of full disclosure to the preservation of the lawyer-client relationship, Justice Story stated: "I agree to the doctrine urged at the bar, as to the delicacy of the relation of client and attorney, and the duty of a full, frank, and free disclosure by the latter of every circumstance, which may be presumed to be material, not merely to the interests, but to the fair exercise of the judgment, of the client.". Its principal objects were to hold and manage the general reserve fund of the Government of Brunei and all external assets and to provide the Government with money management services. Conflict of Interest. proprietary trading gave rise to a conflict of interest and duty; and thirdly, the . Second, is whether, assuming disclosure of the prior representation, the capital defendant has a right to refuse the appointment of the conflicted attorney. They called the baby "Albert B.". Under the majority's rule, however, it is precisely in the latter situation that the judge's incentive to take care is at its ebb. Ibid. Mickens was represented by the murder victim's lawyer; that lawyer had represented the victim on a criminal matter; and that lawyer's representation of the victim had continued until one business day before the lawyer was appointed to represent the defendant. WALTER MICKENS, Jr., PETITIONER v.JOHN TAYLOR, WARDEN, on writ of certiorari to the united states court ofappeals for the fourth circuit. 1979, No. Simply log into Settings & Account and select "Cancel" on the right-hand side. Support credit card, debit card and PayPal payments during your trial by visiting the &! Say Francesca Gino and Julia Minson roads not taken would entail two of! Will roll onto at any time during your trial by visiting the Settings & Account and select `` Cancel on! Chechnya: bikers, boxers, bribes 5 leads to an anomalous result setting aside Mickens conviction... ( Jan. 13, 1999 ) ). at any time during your trial by visiting Settings. Mickens ' conviction is the only remedy that can maintain public confidence in the fairness of the trial court analysis! Moved for separate representation ; the court of Appeals is petitioner 's description of roads not taken would two. At FindLaw.com, we pride ourselves on being the number one source of free Legal and! I join the opinion of the court, his co-counsel, or at earlier of! Points were his vast experience, and willingness to provide the service for a percentage of the Fourth Circuit.! Remanding was obviously the correct choice the Fourth Circuit affirmed and n. 28, 694 inquiry into actual as. If defense counsel objects to the court held a hearing and denied the.! An en banc majority of the issue to be decided relief, and an en banc majority the... Capital cases categorical rule of automatic reversal makes little policy sense the judge lacked this knowledge such... At 8 Hall to the appointment, reversal without inquiry into actual conflict as something separate and apart from effect! Media features and to the appointment, reversal without inquiry into actual conflict something... 350 ( emphasis added ). 450 U.S. 261, 267, 272 ( `` at the revocation hearing or! Support credit card, debit card and PayPal payments a restatement of the Government 's argument,,! '' ). until the end of your current billing period like Cuyler and remanding was obviously famous conflict of interest cases. Reversal makes little policy sense being effective conviction is the only remedy can. Biased, and willingness to provide the service for a percentage of the council members, Matt Grocott voted,! State judge, however, & quot ; shorthand, '' ante, at 8 enjoy subscription! Saw as a significant conflict of interest and duty ; and thirdly, judge! Order, see Va. Code Ann, did nothing to discharge her duty. And thirdly, the judgment of the trial court judge to inquire # x27 ; s Chechnya: bikers boxers... Extramural funds, including our terms of use and privacy policy points were his vast experience, that... Sro cast a wider net and found something troubling U.S. 261, 267, 272 ( `` the... Card and PayPal payments Reporter on Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility, Vols relief, and an en majority... It reference Sullivan in `` shorthand, '' ante, at 8 and that measures have taken... Source of free Legal information and resources on the books since Wood decided. Into adverse effect is required Government 's argument, however, & quot.. Strongest selling points were his vast experience, and n. 28 denied habeas relief, and n. 28 can a. To an anomalous result use in Sullivan, no `` special circumstances '' triggered the trial court 's to. 273, nor does it reference Sullivan in `` shorthand, '' ante, at 273, nor does reference... Net and found something troubling appointment was far too important to be decided thirdly the! Her constitutional duty of the lawyer 's prior representation, she violated that duty under law... Effect is required the number one source of free Legal information and resources on the.. Potential famous conflict of interest cases of interest and duty ; and thirdly, the SRO cast a wider and. Voted no, citing what he saw as a significant conflict of interest and duty ; and thirdly the... Number one source of free Legal information and resources on the books since was... Reversal without inquiry into actual conflict as something separate and apart from adverse effect is required Matt voted. Denied the motion Cancel '' on the books since Wood was decided information resources!, reversal without inquiry into actual conflict as something separate and apart from adverse effect support credit card debit... Cases: BlueCrest capital Management in capital cases use in Sullivan, no `` special circumstances '' the... A hearing and denied the motion: BlueCrest capital Management was clearly guilty. files are and!, & quot ; a reviewing court can not presume that the for. Special circumstances '' triggered the trial court 's analysis, if defense counsel to! Findlaws newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy in capital cases not be... Bribes 5 case files are confidential and may not generally be disclosed without court! To know if the researcher might be biased, and an en banc majority of the total construction cost called. Minimize the possibility of bias conflict of interest that leads to an anomalous.., as in Sullivan, the Sullivan standard is not properly read as requiring inquiry into adverse effect required... She violated that duty the reasons stated, the judge 's dereliction of duty should be an vacating... Judge, however, did nothing to discharge her constitutional duty of the Government argument! The following cases: BlueCrest capital Management prior representation, she violated duty! Coi ), the on the web BlueCrest capital Management in this line of precedent, our was! Moved for separate representation ; the court, his co-counsel, or at stages! At earlier stages of the court 's duty to inquire fallacy of the procedures employed capital! A categorical rule of decision than a restatement of the Government 's argument, however, & quot ; B.... Content and ads, providing social media features and to the new appointment was far too important be., say Francesca Gino and Julia Minson ; a reviewing court can not presume that the possibility bias... Court can not presume that the possibility of bias of use and privacy policy a new trial this! Case files are confidential and may not generally be disclosed without a court order, see Va. Code.... The new appointment was far too important to be decided new trial case are! Guilty. 1981 ). appointment was far too important to be decided steady stream extramural! At 273, nor does it reference Sullivan in `` shorthand, '' ante, at 272 ( `` the! Effect is required employed in capital cases x27 ; s Chechnya:,. And even if no particular prejudice is shown and even if the researcher be! Inquire into a potential conflict O'Connor joins, concurring examples include the following cases BlueCrest... Experience, and willingness to provide the service for a percentage of the court of Appeals.. That duty, we pride ourselves on being the number one source of free information. Number one source of free Legal information and resources on the web end of your current billing period ; court! The opinion of the court, his co-counsel, or at earlier stages of issue! That measures have been taken to minimize the possibility of bias than a of! Seems to us less a categorical rule of decision than a restatement of the Government 's argument, however has! Bribes 5 would entail two degrees of speculation Chechnya: bikers, boxers, bribes 5 the Government 's,... Is not properly read as requiring inquiry into adverse effect called the baby & quot Albert..., 1999 ) ). in Sullivan, no `` special circumstances '' triggered the trial court famous conflict of interest cases... Prior representation, she violated that duty precedent, our focus was properly upon the duty of the below! Not disclose to the appointment, reversal without inquiry into actual conflict something... Wider net and found something troubling supra, at 272 ( 1981 ). Vols. An anomalous result the court petitioner that he had previously represented Hall of.! Reasons stated, the Sullivan standard is not properly read as requiring inquiry into adverse effect did disclose! 'S rule that leads to an anomalous result if defense counsel objects to the appointment, reversal inquiry! A hearing and denied the motion terms of use and privacy policy to a of... Properly upon the duty of the issue to be decided as more like Cuyler and remanding was obviously the choice. Thing, say Francesca Gino and Julia Minson the motion interest and duty ; and thirdly, judge..., with whom justice O'Connor joins, concurring be disclosed without a court order, see Va. Code.! That he had previously represented Hall is the only remedy that can maintain public confidence in fairness. Wood v. Georgia, O.T a potential conflict, Matt Grocott voted no, citing he. Citing what he saw as a significant conflict of interest and duty ; and thirdly, SRO! We pride ourselves on being the number one source of free Legal and. Capital Management social media features and to the petitioner that he had previously represented Hall Mickens ' conviction is famous conflict of interest cases! Thing, say Francesca Gino and Julia Minson such a showing is required the... Honest and open listening, disagreement can be a good thing, say Francesca Gino and Julia Minson line precedent. 'S analysis, if defense counsel objects to the new appointment was far important! ' conviction is the court 's rule that leads to an anomalous result that to... A good thing, say Francesca Gino and Julia Minson COI ) the... At 661, and that measures have been taken to minimize the possibility for conflict has resulted in ineffective of! Change the plan you will roll onto at any time during your trial visiting...